Summary of Comments Made at a Press Conference by Hiroji Ohta, FEPC
Chairman, on January 21, 2000
I welcome members of the Energy Press Club to the first FEPC press conference
of the year. I would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your
hard work during the Y2K transition period, and say that I look forward
to working with you again this year.
Regarding the Y2K problems that the entire nation feared might occur as
the year turned, I am pleased to say that there were no blackouts or interruptions
in service at any of our generating facilities.
As is shown in Reference Document 1, however, there were minor Y2K-related
problems with recording and monitoring systems at some nuclear power plants.
Although the problems did not affect operations, and were quickly repaired,
their occurrence was a disappointment in view of the thorough preparations
we had made for the Y2K transition. It is also true that there were some
regrettable lapses in communication.
We are currently working closely with equipment manufacturers to determine
the causes of the problems we experienced, and ensure that they do not
occur again. We also have a "Leap Day" coming up on February
29, and will apply what we learned during the Y2K transition to ensure
that no problems arise at that time.
As I stated at the last press conference, this is a year of big change
for the electric power industry. First of all, in March, deregulation of
the special high-voltage customer market will begin. Secondly, a number
of developments are expected in the area of nuclear fuel recycling and
waste disposal. A new law affecting high-level radioactive waste disposal
will be enacted, and a new body established to coordinate disposal operations.
An appropriate site must also be found for the spent-fuel interim storage
facility, and a new safety agreement must be finalized for the Rokkasho
Fuel Reprocessing Plant.
There is also expected to be considerable discussion of the nation's long-range
nuclear energy plans. In addition, the Advisory Committee on Energy Policy
established a New Energy Section last December to discuss new energy sources.
In the future, much attention is expected to be focused on these new energy
sources, and on our responsibility to incorporate renewable energy into
the power grid. [ Reference 2 ]
With discussion of these topics just beginning, those of us in the electric
power industry feel that it is important to keep the following considerations
in mind.
First, whatever new energy technologies are discussed, we believe they
should be considered within the framework of the nation's nuclear and other
energy policies, and that a national consensus should be reached on their
use. Whenever countries set out to define energy policy, they must consider
their energy situation and act accordingly, and this is certainly true
with new forms of energy. In deciding what type of energy a resource-poor
nation such as Japan should depend on, we must not over-reach ourselves.
We must choose between various alternatives -- we cannot have them all.
It is for this reason that we believe that nuclear energy and new energy
sources should be discussed within the framework of Japan's overall energy
policy.
Another obvious but important point I would like to make is that discussions
should be based on facts and current realities.
Many people seem to think that the electric power industry is less than
enthusiastic about the development of new energy sources, particularly
renewable energy sources. On the contrary, we have absolutely no objection
to maximizing the potential of Japan's precious solar and wind resources.
In fact, we have independently supported the development of new energy
sources for a number of years. We already purchase all available solar-generated
power at standard rates, and for over 15 years, we have maintained a price
menu for purchasing wind-generated power for commercial use that is over
twice the rate we pay for thermal-generated power.
People also seem to think that Japan lags behind Europe and the United
States in the implementation of new energy sources. In fact, thanks to
government support and our own efforts in the private sector, Japan produces
more solar-generated power than any other nation -- outpacing even the
United States, which in 1998 utilized only 1,000,000 kW of solar-generated
power, as compared with Japan's 1,330,000 kW. In addition, our utilization
of wind-generated power has grown rapidly in recent years. As we discuss
the future of Japan's energy policies, I hope that these facts, as well
as the effects of market deregulation, will be kept in mind.
Given the extremely high expectations people have for new energy sources,
the discussion has a tendency to become a bit skewed at times. For example,
great things are expected of solar and wind power because they are renewable
and easy on the environment. However, I would like to make the following
points to keep the matter in perspective.
1) The land area required to build a solar generating facility capable
of equalling the million-kilowatt output of a single nuclear power plant
is approximately 130 square kilometers. That is an area approximately twice
the size of central Tokyo, and approximately 360 times the size of a nuclear
power plant.
2) In the case of wind power, because output fluctuates, the need to maintain
a constant frequency constrains the amount of power that can be utilized.
In addition, a back-up power supply must be maintained.
3) According to figures released by the Energy Department, to replace the
amount of electricity currently produced by nuclear energy with solar or
wind energy would require an investment 3 times greater, in the case of
wind power, or 30 times greater, in the case of solar power.
I believe that it is essential that the discussion of how these negative
factors are to be evaluated, and whether they can be overcome, be based
on actual facts and figures.
The current debate on our long-range nuclear energy and new energy policies
will -- along with electric power industry deregulation -- have a profound
effect on the nation's economy, society and energy policy in the 21st century.
I therefore hope, as I stated earlier, that we can clearly define the role
of nuclear energy and new energy sources within the framework of our overall
energy policy, and achieve a national consensus.
In conlclusion, I would like to say that I always welcome the comments
and suggestions of Energy Press Club members, and thank you for your attendance
today.