|
Summary of Policy
Package Model
|
Sub-committee Evaluation
(in terms of reliability of emissions
control)
|
|
<Model 1:Priority placed
on the Guideline of Measures to Prevent Global
Warming
- While implementing all of the measures
specified in the Guideline of Measures to Prevent
Global Warming conducting a full evaluative review
of all policies by 2008.
(A combination of elements [1],
[9], and [10].)
|
Compared with other models,
there is little to guarantee that the policies will
actually be implemented, making this model the
weakest candidate in terms of reliability of
emissions control. It is expected that this model
would result in a high dependence on the national
government to perform final adjustments.
|
|
<Model 2: Strengthening
autonomous initiatives>
- In the industrial sector, creating a
framework in which the government approves
autonomously formulated plans, or in which business
operators are required to formulate plans.
- In the residential and transportation sectors,
establishing compulsory energy conservation
standards for large buildings and housing
complexes, promoting green policies through
automotive taxes, and otherwise further enhancing
countermeasures.
(A combination of elements [2] or
[3], as well as [5], [9],
and [10]).
|
Although the establishment of
enforcement measures makes this model stronger than
<Model 1> when it comes to the reliability of
emissions control, it is still less reliable than
models that incorporate environmental taxes or
emissions transactions. It is expected that this
model would result in a relatively high dependence
on the national government to perform final
adjustments.
|
|
<Model 3: Environmental
tax>
- Introduce an environmental tax that will
promote the broad-based involvement of all entities
that emit greenhouse gases.
- Include mitigating measures to ease the impact on
the mid- and long-term prospects for Japan's
industrial structure, and on the everyday lives of
citizens.
- Measures in the residential and transportation
sectors are the same as in <Model 2>.
(A combination of elements [5],
[7], [9], and [10]).
|
Although it's possible that this
model will rely on the national government to
perform final adjustments, the reliability of
emissions control can be increased through the
appropriate adjustment of tax rates.
|
|
<Model 4: Environmental
tax and large-scale monitoring>
- While promoting broad-based involvement
through the introduction of an environmental tax,
regulating overall emissions or introducing an
emissions transaction system instead of a tax in
industries or fields where greater reliability of
emissions control is needed.
- Measures in the residential and transportation
sectors are the same as in <Model 2>.
(A combination of elements [5],
[8], [9], and [10]).
|
Because the reliability of
emissions control is high in the specified fields
where overall emissions are regulated or where a
partial emissions transaction system is introduced,
dependence on the national government to perform
final adjustments would be lower than with
<Model 3>.
|
|
<Model 5:Hybrid-type
emissions transactions>
- Introduce a hybrid emissions transaction
system for importers and producers of fossil fuels
as well as large-scale emitters, in order to
steadily reduce emissions.
- After 2008, link Japan's domestic emissions
transaction system with the international
system.
- Measures in the residential and transportation
sectors are the same as in <Model 2>.
(A combination of elements [5],
[6], [9], and [10]).
|
This model would reliably
control the overall amount of CO2 emitted by Japan
as a result of burning fossil fuels. This model
would reliably control the overall amount of CO2
emitted by Japan as a result of burning fossil
fuels.
|